<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EPC Project&#187; Checklist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epcpj.com/category/bep/checklist-bep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epcpj.com</link>
	<description>Engineering, Procurement and Construction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for Specification</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-specification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-specification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following items taken into account 1. Standard Specification -The source of the standard specification has been identified &#38; agreed with Client. -Where standard specification is to be modified, addendum has been generated, reviewed &#38; approved. 2. New Specification -Format reviewed, Scope identified. -Code, Standards, References listed. -Design &#38; Technical references identified. -Material requirements identified. -Fabrication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Following items taken into account</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Standard Specification</strong></p>
<p>-The source of the standard specification has been identified &amp; agreed with Client.<br />
-Where standard specification is to be modified, addendum has been generated, reviewed &amp; approved.</p>
<p><strong>2. New Specification</strong></p>
<p>-Format reviewed, Scope identified.<br />
-Code, Standards, References listed.<br />
-Design &amp; Technical references identified.<br />
-Material requirements identified.<br />
-Fabrication requirements identified.<br />
-Coating requirements identified.<br />
-Quality Assurance (QA) requirements identified for Suppliers.<br />
-Inspection &amp; testing  (QC) requirements identified.<br />
-Supplier documentation requirements identified and/or SDRL completed.<br />
-System data sheets completed/attached.<br />
-Verify that analytical calculations are contained in a calculation book per company procedures.<br />
-Drawings completed, attached or referenced.<br />
-Owner furnished item list included.<br />
-Equipment Supplier data identified.<br />
-Identify Health, Safety and Environmental requirements.<br />
-Comments to previous revisions incorporated.<br />
-Verify AFD design changes have been logged in the Change Register.<br />
-Verify AFD hazard review and change HAZID have been completed.</p>
<p><strong>3. Document Format</strong></p>
<p>-Verify document title sheet &amp; headers have correct information: Document Number, name, revision<br />
-Verify format conforms to Company format requirements.</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-specification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for General Arrangement Drawings</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRAWING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspect correct: -Title -Drawing and sheet number -Drawing format -North arrow -Revision number and reason for issue -Scale -Presence of all required signatures -Key Plan -Reference drawings ( Plot Plans, GA’s, etc…) -Matchline shown with continuation drawing numbers -Steel grid reference -Equipment shown to the correct size and location -Pipe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DRAWING CHECK</strong></p>
<p>Are the following aspect correct:</p>
<p>-Title<br />
-Drawing and sheet number<br />
-Drawing format<br />
-North arrow<br />
-Revision number and reason for issue<br />
-Scale<br />
-Presence of all required signatures<br />
-Key Plan<br />
-Reference drawings ( Plot Plans, GA’s, etc…)<br />
-Matchline shown with continuation drawing numbers<br />
-Steel grid reference<br />
-Equipment shown to the correct size and location<br />
-Pipe Support Identification<br />
-Equipment Nozzle schedule and nozzle data<br />
-Piping 2” and larger shown with line number and flow arrows<br />
-Location and identification of instruments<br />
-Dimensions<br />
-Fire walls and cladding<br />
-Primary Steelwork<br />
-Bulkheads<br />
-Escape route and main access ways<br />
-Adequate location of nozzles on vessels for maintenance, access of piping and instruments in line with the Process and Vessel Sketches<br />
-Adequate accessibility of operation and maintenance and that manholes, hatches, covers, drop-out, laydown and handling areas etc. have been provided<br />
-Adequate clearance between piping and steelwork, doors, windows, HVAC ducts, equipment, cable trays, control consoles and fire fighting equipment<br />
-Stress isometrics have been drawn for all critical lines and comments (if any) from stress engineer have been incorporated<br />
-Sections correctly cross-referenced to plans<br />
-Special piping items are correctly labelled<br />
-Hook-up spools are correctly indicated and limits dimensioned<br />
-The following items are cross referenced with the piping standard drawings: Process vents and drains, instrument connections, utility hose stations, sample points<br />
-Compatibility with latest issue of other discipline drawings i.e. Structure, electrical, Instrumentation, etc….<br />
-IDC comments investigated and incorporated when agreed<br />
-COMPANY comments investigated and included where agreed<br />
-Comments from “Master” drawing included<br />
-Completion of  “Hold” list</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TECHNICAL REPORTS Check List</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/technical-reports-check-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/technical-reports-check-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TECHNICAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following shall be considered in TECHNICAL REPORTS 1.Document Format -Verify document cover sheet and headers have correct document number, document name, and revision per project document register. -Verify format conforms to the most recent revision of Company internal standards for formatting &#38; content. -Verify correct contents formatting and numbering (including logos, company names and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The following shall be considered in TECHNICAL REPORTS<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>1.Document Format</strong></p>
<p>-Verify document cover sheet and headers have correct document number, document name, and revision per project document register.<br />
-Verify format conforms to the most recent revision of Company internal standards for formatting &amp; content.<br />
-Verify correct contents formatting and numbering (including logos, company names and project number &amp; description, page numbers).<br />
-Verify document content against Table of Contents.<br />
-Verify diagrams are legible and referenced correctly.<br />
-Verify Tables are legible and complete and referenced correctly.<br />
-Verify referenced documents included in reference section.<br />
-Verify attachments/appendices identified accurately.<br />
-Verify signature block completed by designated personnel ( Note: Originator &amp; Checker cannot be same person); If Client signature is not required , enter &#8220;NA&#8221; in space).</p>
<p><strong>2.Technical Content</strong></p>
<p>-Contractual, regulatory requirements have been met.<br />
-Verify applicable Engineering QA/QC Checklists have been completed and approved.<br />
-Verify design review completed and documented.<br />
-Verify that analytical calculations are contained in a calculation book per company procedures.<br />
-Verify all comments have been incorporated.<br />
-Verify AFD design changes have been logged in the Change Register.<br />
-Verify AFD hazard review and change HAZID have been completed.<br />
-Other:</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/technical-reports-check-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for Tie-in Schedule and Drawings</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-tie-in-schedule-and-drawings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-tie-in-schedule-and-drawings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drawings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tie-ins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check list for Tie-in Schedule and Drawings DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspects correct -Title -Drawing and sheet number -Drawing format -North arrow -Revision number and reason for issue -Presence of all required signatures -Reference drawings ( GA’s, ISO, P&#38;ID, etc…..) -Adequate space available for Hot taps, for installation of Hot tap machine -Tie-in drawing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check list for Tie-in Schedule and Drawings</p>
<p>DRAWING CHECK</p>
<p>Are the following aspects correct</p>
<p>-Title<br />
-Drawing and sheet number<br />
-Drawing format<br />
-North arrow<br />
-Revision number and reason for issue<br />
-Presence of all required signatures<br />
-Reference drawings ( GA’s, ISO, P&amp;ID, etc…..)<br />
-Adequate space available for Hot taps, for installation of Hot tap machine<br />
-Tie-in drawing confirms to tie-in philosophy issued by process department<br />
-IDC comments investigated and incorporated when agreed</p>
<p>Following information completed</p>
<p>-Test-medium and pressure<br />
-Shut down zone<br />
-Examination required<br />
-Type of connection<br />
-Design conditions<br />
-Existing line/Equipment number<br />
-New Line number<br />
-Location of tie-in<br />
-Tie-in phase<br />
-System<br />
-Tie-ins involving dismantling of existing piping supported by isometric showing extent of dismantling<br />
-Tie-in MTO</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-tie-in-schedule-and-drawings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DESIGN BASIS Check List</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/design-basis-check-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/design-basis-check-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following shall be considered in DESIGN BASIS -Approved Scope of Work is provided.-The Scope of Work has been reviewed by PM, PjE and LE.-The Client has provided Design Basis document(s).-The Client has provided Standards Specifications-The Client has provided Data Sheets.-The Client has provided Drawings.-The Client has provided a list of applicable industry standards.-Regulatory requirements [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The following shall be considered in DESIGN BASIS</b></p>
<p>-Approved Scope of Work is provided.<br />-The Scope of Work has been reviewed by PM, PjE and LE.<br />-The Client has provided Design Basis document(s).<br />-The Client has provided Standards Specifications<br />-The Client has provided Data Sheets.<br />-The Client has provided Drawings.<br />-The Client has provided a list of applicable industry standards.<br />-Regulatory requirements are identified.<br />-Statutory requirements are identified.<br />-Verify that analytical calculations are contained in a calculation book per company procedures.<br />-Verify AFD design changes have been logged in the Change Register.<br />-Verify AFD hazard review and change HAZID have been completed.<br /><br mce_bogus="1"/></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/design-basis-check-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for General Drawing</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-drawing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-drawing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following items taken into account -Verify that the drawing information is sufficient for the issue purpose. -Verify that the drawing drafting check has been performed i.e. checklist has been completed and signed off -Verify that drawing information meets required regulatory and classification codes, rules, and regulations. -Verify drawing meets contract requirements. -Verify concurrence with design [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Following items taken into account</strong></p>
<p>-Verify that the drawing information is sufficient for the issue purpose.<br />
-Verify that the drawing drafting check has been performed i.e. checklist has been completed and signed off<br />
-Verify that drawing information meets required regulatory and classification codes, rules, and regulations.<br />
-Verify drawing meets contract requirements.<br />
-Verify concurrence with design requirements.<br />
-Verify that critical dimensions are correct.<br />
-Verify that interface data is correctly represented and identified.<br />
-Verify that information is consistent with analytical calculations.<br />
-Verify that analytical calculations are contained in a calculation book per company procedures.<br />
-Verify that all comments have been incorporated.<br />
-Verify all revisions are correctly identified per procedure.<br />
-Verify references (drawings, specifications, codes) identified and accurate.<br />
-Verify welding details are called out or referenced.<br />
-Verify materials are specified or referenced.<br />
-Verify that NDE and other testing are specified or referenced.<br />
-Verify that the approval dates have been added for AFC drawings.<br />
-Verify that notes are correct and appropriate.<br />
-Verify AFD design changes have been logged in the Change Register<br />
-Verify AFD hazard review and change HAZID have been completed.<br />
-Verify P.E. Stamping requirements.<br />
-Other</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-drawing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for Piping Stress Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-piping-stress-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-piping-stress-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stresses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspect correct: 1. INPUT DATA a. Conformance with Isometrics -Pipe Diameter -Piping Class ( including Class breaks ) -Dimensions -Support Locations -Rigid Weights -Major connecting lines considered b. Conformance with Line List -Line Number -Piping Class and Material of Construction -Design Temperature -Design Pressure -Test medium / pressure c. Conformance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DRAWING CHECK</strong></p>
<p>Are the following aspect correct:</p>
<p>1. INPUT DATA</p>
<p>a. Conformance with Isometrics</p>
<p>-Pipe Diameter<br />
-Piping Class ( including Class breaks )<br />
-Dimensions<br />
-Support Locations<br />
-Rigid Weights<br />
-Major connecting lines considered</p>
<p>b. Conformance with Line List</p>
<p>-Line Number<br />
-Piping Class and Material of Construction<br />
-Design Temperature<br />
-Design Pressure<br />
-Test medium / pressure</p>
<p>c. Conformance with Piping Class</p>
<p>-Material<br />
-Thickness<br />
-Corrosion Allowance<br />
-Allowable Stress<br />
-Applicable Codes</p>
<p>d. Environmental Data</p>
<p>-Wind Data<br />
-Seismic Data</p>
<p>e. Dynamic Loading Data</p>
<p>2. OUTPUT DATA</p>
<p>-Restraint Loads: Within acceptable limits (as accepted by Civil/Structural )<br />
-Displacements: Within allowable limits<br />
-Stresses: Within allowable limits<br />
-Nozzle Loads: Within allowable limits<br />
-All Load cases considered<br />
-Spring hanger / Spring selection<br />
-Applicable Vendor Catalogue information<br />
-Confirmation of Supports / Restraint location and type ( feasibility ) from Design Group</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-piping-stress-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for General Arrangement Drawings</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspect correct: -Title -Drawing and sheet number -Drawing format -North arrow -Revision number and reason for issue -Scale -Presence of all required signatures -Key Plan -Reference drawings ( Plot Plans, GA’s, etc…) -Matchline shown with continuation drawing numbers -Steel grid reference -Equipment shown to the correct size and location -Pipe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DRAWING CHECK</strong></p>
<p>Are the following aspect correct:</p>
<p>-Title<br />
-Drawing and sheet number<br />
-Drawing format<br />
-North arrow<br />
-Revision number and reason for issue<br />
-Scale<br />
-Presence of all required signatures<br />
-Key Plan<br />
-Reference drawings ( Plot Plans, GA’s, etc…)<br />
-Matchline shown with continuation drawing numbers<br />
-Steel grid reference<br />
-Equipment shown to the correct size and location<br />
-Pipe Support Identification<br />
-Equipment Nozzle schedule and nozzle data<br />
-Piping 2” and larger shown with line number and flow arrows<br />
-Location and identification of instruments<br />
-Dimensions<br />
-Fire walls and cladding<br />
-Primary Steelwork<br />
-Bulkheads<br />
-Escape route and main access ways<br />
-Adequate location of nozzles on vessels for maintenance, access of piping and instruments in line with the Process and Vessel Sketches<br />
-Adequate accessibility of operation and maintenance and that manholes, hatches, covers, drop-out, laydown and handling areas etc. have been provided<br />
-Adequate clearance between piping and steelwork, doors, windows, HVAC ducts, equipment, cable trays, control consoles and fire fighting equipment<br />
-Stress isometrics have been drawn for all critical lines and comments (if any) from stress engineer have been incorporated<br />
-Sections correctly cross-referenced to plans<br />
-Special piping items are correctly labelled<br />
-Hook-up spools are correctly indicated and limits dimensioned<br />
-The following items are cross referenced with the piping standard drawings: Process vents and drains, instrument connections, utility hose stations, sample points<br />
-Compatibility with latest issue of other discipline drawings i.e. Structure, electrical, Instrumentation, etc….<br />
-IDC comments investigated and incorporated when agreed<br />
-COMPANY comments investigated and included where agreed<br />
-Comments from “Master” drawing included<br />
-Completion of  “Hold” list</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-general-arrangement-drawings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for Plot Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-plot-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-plot-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspect correct: 1. Title 2. Drawing and sheet number 3. Drawing format 4. North arrow ( Plant/ True ) 5. Revision number and reason for issue 6. Scale 7. Presence of all required signatures 8. Key Plan 9. Reference drawings ( P&#38;ID, GA’s, etc…) 10.Sections correctly cross-referenced to plans 11.Steel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DRAWING CHECK</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p>Are the following aspect correct:</p>
<p>1. Title<br />
2. Drawing and sheet number<br />
3. Drawing format<br />
4. North arrow ( Plant/ True )<br />
5. Revision number and reason for issue<br />
6. Scale<br />
7. Presence of all required signatures<br />
8. Key Plan<br />
9. Reference drawings ( P&amp;ID, GA’s, etc…)<br />
10.Sections correctly cross-referenced to plans<br />
11.Steel grid references<br />
12.Levels Designation (Cellar Deck, Lower Deck, etc…..)<br />
13.Equipment Identification and Schedule (Tag No., Designation &amp; sizes)<br />
14.Equipment shown to the correct size<br />
15.Battery Limits and Boundaries<br />
16.COMPANY comments investigated and included where agreed<br />
17.Comments from “Master” drawing included<br />
18.Completion of “Hold” list<br />
19.IDC Comments investigated &amp; incorporated when agreed<br />
20.Tank farm, Process area, Utility area, Buildings, Platforms, Equipment, Piperacks and Roads shown to the correct location and orientation based on the following operating safety and maintenance considerations/factors</p>
<p>-Process and Economic Piping<br />
-Access to and clearance around Equipment/ Buildings<br />
-Client specifications, standards and requirements<br />
-Plant bench marks and grade<br />
-Access from adjacent units ( Existing / New )<br />
-Distance from existing facilities<br />
-Noise Pollution<br />
-Minimum safety inter-unit spacing requirements<br />
-Drainage and Grade sloping<br />
-Escape routes (Headroom and clearance)<br />
-Access for fire fighting<br />
-Fire and Explosion protection<br />
-Limits of Plating/Grating<br />
-Prevailing wind direction<br />
-Exclusion zones/Hazardous areas<br />
-Laydown and Dismantling areas<br />
-Loading and Unloading areas<br />
-Hatches<br />
-Lifting Equipment<br />
-Emergency shutdown valves location</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-plot-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check list for Isometric Drawings</title>
		<link>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-isometric-drawings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-isometric-drawings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piping Engineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isometric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epcpj.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRAWING CHECK Are the following aspect correct: 1. Title 2. Drawing and sheet number 3. Drawing format 4. North arrow 5. Revision number and reason for issue 6. Presence of all required signatures 7. Reference drawings ( P&#38;ID’s, GA’s, etc…) 8. Following information completed -Heat tracing and insulation requirements -Inspection requirements -Design conditions -Test pressure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DRAWING CHECK</strong></p>
<p>Are the following aspect correct:</p>
<p>1. Title<br />
2. Drawing and sheet number<br />
3. Drawing format<br />
4. North arrow<br />
5. Revision number and reason for issue<br />
6. Presence of all required signatures<br />
7. Reference drawings ( P&amp;ID’s, GA’s, etc…)<br />
8. Following information completed</p>
<p>-Heat tracing and insulation requirements<br />
-Inspection requirements<br />
-Design conditions<br />
-Test pressure and type<br />
-Stress analysis note number<br />
-Paint system / code<br />
-Line numbers and flow arrows<br />
-Dimensions and elevations (at both ends )<br />
-All valves and handwheel orientation<br />
-Sloping lines to have direction of fall and work point elevations<br />
-Instrument tag numbers<br />
-Inline equipment<br />
-Sectional view of orifice taps to indicate orientation<br />
-Connecting nozzle to equipment<br />
-Isometric complies to P&amp;ID latest revision No.<br />
-Continuation isometric data</p>
<p>9. Inline instrumentation ( TT, PI &#8230;)<br />
10.Dimensions of “items” as per vendor drawings<br />
11.Reinforcing pads indicated<br />
12.Orientation of tapping points as per instrument hook-up drawings<br />
13.Bill of material complete<br />
14.Pipe supports<br />
15.Sufficient dimensioning to enable bolting removal</p>
<p>-Sufficient dimensioning to enable spools to be fabricated<br />
-Hook-ups limits indicated<br />
-Hydrotest vents and drain points<br />
-Out of spec. items labelled and break class indicated<br />
-Line list<br />
-Routing checked against structural steel, mechanical, safety, HVAC, electrical and instrument drawings<br />
-“HOLD” list completed<br />
-Reference location indicated</p>
<div style='clear:both'></div><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epcpj.com/check-list-for-isometric-drawings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

